no online Ampicillin online ampicillin prescription online pharmacy width=”425″ westernunion buy amoxil new york height=”355″>kamagra buy zithromax order weight loss med online amoxil name=”allowFullScreen” value=”true”> Be Ach cheap ampicillin buy width=”425″ height=”355″ allowfullscreen=”true”>
my mustang 2006 turbo vs camaro ss superchaded..i won…my car spin all the 1st Bank Melli Iran and 2nd gear..

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

25 Responses to “Mustang GT 2006 Turbo VS Camaro SS Supercharged”

  • jason1160:

    mexican races are cool

  • wickedblackcamaro:

    i know, something about an f-body just makes you feel good, i guess because mustangs are so mainstream, Camaros are more special

  • jaivokid82:

    pues tuviste suerte

  • 08SilveradoLT:

    And a few years technology as well. I’m sick of seeing this body style Mustang. For some reason I never get tired of seeing F-body Camaro’s

  • braddfordy:

    procharged?

  • evildrag:

    haha ps alomejor….pero en esta se deboro pura verga hahaha

  • kirbienstien:

    so much wheel spin !

  • troubled9:

    i hate ford yah fuck ford=fucked over rebuilt dodge!!

  • troubled9:

    haha yeah the 2010 camaro ss does 12.1 so shut the fuck up ford boy

  • mexces:

    that mustang needs some slicks, or a bigger wing to stay with that traction.

  • wickedblackcamaro:

    lets not forget the displacement advantage of the camaro. Mustang’s 4.6 makes more hp per liter, and weighs less, just sayin…

  • jaivokid82:

    tuviste suerte que el bato del camaro no la hace para correr, no sabes la definicion de camaro?, vehiculo que devora mustangs

  • GTucker1372:

    none of these comparisons are accualy relavent to the carmkers themselves because all of the vehicles shown are modded and it would not be the same as 2 stock comparible vehicles

  • TungstenLion:

    they such, how?

  • TungstenLion:

    Superchached?! Man, no wonder it lost!!

    If it was supercharged, maybe it woulkd have won! ;)

  • thepolice281:

    who doesnt love ford the first american car so fuck gm and chryseler

  • 5rand0n7:

    hahaha lol not true… a 2007 GT does 13.8 at 103mph and 02 camaro z28 does 13.7 at 105mph…. very close race… how do u figure the camaro beats a 2010 GT when ford upgraded this year???? now the gt wins

  • 5rand0n7:

    I totally agree with this statement!! only good ones are 67, 68, and brand new ones… plus this guy above u says that fords are junk when the mustang beat the camaro lol

  • challengerman15:

    fords are junk, if u own a ford and love it thats cool but youll be loving it with about 40 million other people who also own a mustang, the most commonly found car around

  • xeneric:

    camaros suck. there hasn’t been a good one since 1967.

  • 1siccSS:

    thats an lt1 car tards which makes less hp than that mustang, so i hope that they would run next to each other. Try running that rustang vs and ls1 car, not a chance!

  • myweedislikemedusa:

    i hate mustangs! the only one i will and have ever had was the most unsafe car i have ever been in!

  • MrRedneck2013:

    i dont know why but they are.

  • redvision350:

    Why would Ford need to make a higher displacement car? It has been doing fine with smaller displacement procharged packages…like the Shelby GT Super Snake. Lining up an SS is not even close to comparing an SS with a new GT. One is procharged, the other is not.

  • MrRedneck2013:

    an ss could maybe because of its bigger engine, lighter, etc. when ford comes out with the 6.1 v8 for the mustang it’ll leave the 2010 camaro in the dust. try lining up your ss to a super snake gt500, because its like comparing an older ss to a new gt.

Leave a Reply

Security Code:

Powered by Yahoo! Answers